Puritan and Restoration age
This blog is written as a Sunday Reading task assigned by the head of the department of English Mkbu, professor and Dr.Dilip barad sir.
In about 200–250 words, explain how the political and religious climate of each period influenced its literature.
Highlight at least two distinct literary genres or trends in each period.
Answer.
The Puritan Age and the Restoration Age: Literature Shaped by Politics and Religion.
The history of English literature clearly reflects the political and religious climate of each age. The Puritan Age (1620–1660) and the Restoration Age (1660–1700) stand as two contrasting periods, not only in politics and religion but also in their literary output.
The Puritan Age was dominated by the influence of the Puritan movement, which emphasized strict morality, simplicity, and devotion to God. The political background was equally tense, as the conflict between the monarchy and Parliament led to the English Civil War and the execution of Charles I. Religion played a central role in everyday life, and this seriousness is visible in the literature of the time. Writers like John Milton and George Herbert infused their works with deep spiritual meaning. Milton’s Paradise Lost became the great epic of the age, presenting Biblical themes of obedience, temptation, and redemption. Alongside poetry, religious prose and sermons became popular, aiming to guide people in matters of faith and discipline. Even pamphlets and tracts carried moral and religious debates, showing that literature was meant to reform, instruct, and purify society.
With the Restoration of the monarchy in 1660 under Charles II, the entire climate changed. After years of Puritan restraint, society now embraced pleasure, wit, and artistic freedom. The theatre, which had been closed under Puritan rule, was revived and gave rise to the Comedy of Manners. Writers like William Congreve and George Etherege mocked the hypocrisy, flirtations, and intrigues of aristocratic life. Poetry too took a different shape. Satire flourished as John Dryden and others used sharp wit to comment on politics, religion, and social behavior. Literary style became polished, witty, and urbane, in contrast to the moral earnestness of the previous age.
Thus, the Puritan Age produced literature that was serious, religious, and morally instructive, while the Restoration Age reflected a world of wit, elegance, and worldly pleasures. Together, they show how literature mirrors the values and struggles of its time.
Q2. Draw a comparative timeline showing major political events and their corresponding literary milestones for both ages.
Answer:
A Comparative Timeline of the Puritan and Restoration Ages.
The Puritan Age (1620–1660) and the Restoration Age (1660–1700) are two contrasting periods in English history where politics and religion strongly shaped literature. During the Puritan Age, the migration of the Puritans to America in 1620 symbolized the search for spiritual freedom and laid the foundation of strict moral discipline. In 1625, Charles I came to the throne, and his growing conflicts with Parliament soon led to turmoil. The outbreak of the English Civil War in 1642 changed the cultural landscape completely, as theatres were closed and drama was silenced. Literature turned toward sermons, pamphlets, and religious poetry, focusing on devotion and morality. In 1649, the execution of Charles I and the establishment of Cromwell’s Commonwealth gave literature an even more serious and didactic tone. Writers such as George Herbert and Richard Baxter produced devotional works, while John Milton, the greatest figure of this period, wrote political pamphlets and later completed Paradise Lost in 1660, an epic that captured the Puritan struggle between obedience and rebellion.
With the Restoration of Charles II in 1660, the political and cultural mood shifted dramatically. Theatres reopened, giving birth to the brilliant but worldly Comedy of Manners, which mocked the hypocrisy and fashions of aristocratic life. The disasters of the Plague and the Great Fire of London in 1665–1666 found a place in Samuel Pepys’s Diary, blending history with literature. In 1667, Milton’s Paradise Lost was finally published, though its solemn Puritan spirit stood in contrast to the light-hearted society of the Restoration. The 1670s and 1680s witnessed witty comedies by William Congreve and George Etherege, while satire flourished with John Dryden’s Absalom and Achitophel in 1681, a brilliant response to political conflicts of the time. By the 1690s, Dryden also established himself as the father of English criticism through works like An Essay of Dramatic Poesy, marking a new literary milestone.
Thus, the Puritan Age reflected an era of seriousness, morality, and religion, while the Restoration Age embraced wit, satire, and worldly pleasures. Seen together in a timeline, the two periods reveal how literature closely followed the currents of history—discipline and devotion under Puritan rule, and wit and entertainment under Restoration freedom.
Q3. Imagine you are a literary critic in 1700 writing a review titled "From Purity to Pleasure: The English Muse in Transformation".
Write a short analytical review (300–350 words) discussing:
The shift in moral tone from Puritan to Restoration literature.
How this shift might have been received by audiences of the time.
Answer:
From Purity to Pleasure: The English Muse in Transformation
As the century turns, one cannot help but reflect upon the remarkable transformation of English letters. The English Muse, once clothed in the severe garments of Puritan devotion, now dances freely in the bright silks of Restoration wit. The shift in moral tone is as striking as the change in our nation’s fortunes—from the solemn silence of Cromwell’s rule to the sparkling laughter of Charles II’s court.
During the Puritan ascendancy, literature bore a grave responsibility. Its voice was didactic, its purpose moral. Milton, our greatest poet of that age, gave us Paradise Lost, a work of sublime grandeur which sought to “justify the ways of God to man.” Devotional verse, pious sermons, and austere prose filled the presses, guiding souls rather than entertaining minds. The theatre lay dark and silent, deemed a nest of corruption, while poetry aspired to spiritual purity rather than worldly delight.
The Restoration, however, revived both the monarchy and the stage. With the return of King Charles II, gaiety, wit, and pleasure became the ruling taste. The Comedy of Manners, perfected by Congreve and Etherege, portrays with elegant satire the intrigues and follies of fashionable society. Poetry itself has grown sharper, embracing satire as its favored weapon. Dryden’s Absalom and Achitophel not only delights but instructs, using wit to illuminate the turbulence of our politics. The English Muse, once preaching obedience and restraint, now thrives in liberty, laughter, and refinement.
Audiences of our time have received this change with mixed sentiments. The aristocracy, weary of Puritan sternness, welcomes wit and indulgence as a long-denied feast. Yet, among the devout and the elderly, there lingers regret for the lost solemnity, a fear that pleasure has usurped virtue. Still, it is undeniable that English literature has broadened its compass—from purity to pleasure, from moral instruction to social satire—and in so doing, it reflects the very transformation of our nation.
Q4. Debate prompt:
"The Restoration Age liberated English literature from the constraints of Puritan moralism."
Take a stand (Agree/Disagree/Partially Agree) and justify your position with three well-argued points supported by examples.
Answer:
Debate: Did the Restoration Age Liberate English Literature from Puritan Moralism?
Position: I Agree
The Restoration Age (1660–1700) did indeed liberate English literature from the stern moral discipline of the Puritan Age. The change in political power from the Commonwealth to the monarchy reshaped not only society but also the very spirit of literature. I support this view for three reasons:
1. Revival of Drama and Theatre
Under Puritan rule, theatres were closed in 1642, silencing one of the most vibrant forms of English literature. The Puritans considered plays immoral and corrupting. However, with the return of Charles II, theatres reopened in 1660, giving birth to the Comedy of Manners. Writers like William Congreve and George Etherege created witty plays that explored love, fashion, and aristocratic hypocrisy—subjects that Puritan austerity would never have allowed. Thus, the Restoration liberated drama from Puritan restrictions.
2. Rise of Satire and Wit
Puritan literature was dominated by religious prose, sermons, and devotional poetry, aimed at moral instruction. In contrast, the Restoration fostered sharp satire and intellectual wit. John Dryden’s Absalom and Achitophel is a masterful political satire, blending humor with commentary on real political crises. This playful, worldly approach to literature marks a decisive break from Puritan seriousness, showing how freedom of thought replaced moral preaching.
3. Expansion of Literary Genres
The Puritan Age confined literature largely to religious themes, producing great works like Milton’s Paradise Lost but discouraging variety. The Restoration, however, encouraged diversity—satirical poetry, diary writing, literary criticism, and comedies all flourished. Samuel Pepys’s Diary offered a new, personal form of writing, while Dryden’s Essay of Dramatic Poesy laid the foundation of English literary criticism. Such genres were possible only after the decline of Puritan moral control.
Conclusion
The Restoration Age, though sometimes accused of immorality, gave English literature freedom to explore society, politics, and human behavior with wit and variety. By breaking free from the rigidity of Puritan moralism, it set the stage for a more vibrant and expressive literary tradition.
Q5. If John Milton and John Dryden had met in 1670, what might they have said to each other about the purpose of literature?
Write a dialogue of 150–200 words between the two, incorporating their likely ideological differences and stylistic preferences.
Answer:
A Meeting of Minds: Milton and Dryden in Dialogue (1670)
What if John Milton, the great Puritan poet, and John Dryden, the master of Restoration wit, had met in 1670? Their views on literature, shaped by two very different worlds, would have created a fascinating exchange.
Milton: Master Dryden, I have long believed that literature must serve a higher cause. Poetry ought to elevate the soul, guide mankind to virtue, and glorify God. My Paradise Lost seeks to “justify the ways of God to men.” What greater purpose could there be?
Dryden: Noble Milton, your vision is grand, yet the times have changed. Literature, I think, must also delight. Our readers seek wit, elegance, and reflection of society. In my comedies and satires, I show men their follies, using laughter as my instrument. Is not moral truth clearer when clothed in wit?
Milton: But does laughter not risk triviality? The Muse must be sacred, not enslaved to fashion or pleasure. If literature forgets its divine responsibility, it loses its nobility.
Dryden: And yet, sir, if literature refuses the world’s realities, it risks irrelevance. Our task is twofold: to instruct and to entertain. Without delight, instruction falls on deaf ears.
Milton: Perhaps we differ only in degree. You serve man’s society; I serve God’s eternity.
Dryden: And perhaps both labors, though different, enrich the English Muse.
Reference:
